Environmentalists sue over Quincy logging plan, Associated Press & Record
Courier
By Don Thompson
[Forwarded by Resource Media & Shasta High School Environmental Club]
SACRAMENTO -In a lawsuit filed Tuesday against the U.S. Forest Service, environmental
groups claimed a 6-year-old federal law aimed at preventing wildfires has degenerated
into a backdoor effort to eventually increase logging across 340,000 acres of
Sierra Nevada national forests.
Filed in federal court in Sacramento, the suit challenges the Forest Service's
effort to log 6,400 acres over five years in the Plumas National Forest west of
Quincy, where a coalition of loggers and local conservationists once met to propose
what eventually became national fire-prevention policy.
The Forest Service says the clearing project will reduce the risk of catastrophic
wildfire near the small Sierra mountain town of Meadow Valley, while providing
local logging jobs.
The environmental groups say the plan allows the cutting of bigger, more fire-resistant
trees in an area already cleared of smaller, more flammable material. They say
it also would destroy 4,280 acres of old trees around 16 California spotted owl
nesting sites.
The debate goes to the heart of the controversy over fire prevention activities
across the West, particularly in a pending plan to manage 11 million acres of
national forest land the length of the Sierra range.
Forest Service spokesman Matt Mathes said the 6,400 acres are unique, because
the agreement "specifically requires us to promote the economic health of
that area, and part of that is helping the local timber industry." The tract
of land is called the Quincy Library Group after the local coalition that developed
the original agreement.
"That's a ruse," responded Chad Hanson of the John Muir Project, one
of the groups that sued. "There's nothing in the law that requires them to
log the largest 1 percent of the trees remaining in that area." Jobs could
just as well be provided by cutting smaller trees and brush or providing other
services.
"This is supposed to be about reducing the potential for severe fire near
communities," Hanson said. The project, as planned, "will increase the
potential for fire right next to the community."
The suit seeks to force the Forest Service to conduct a full environmental impact
review before it permits logging of large trees. The suit filed by the Earthjustice
law firm also includes the Sierra Nevada Forest Protection Campaign and the Plumas
Forest Project.
Additional logging under the Quincy Library Group pilot project could include
up to 343,500 acres of the Plumas, Lassen and Tahoe national forests over five
years, said Earthjustice researcher Emily Brown. The environmental groups contend
the Forest Service has not studied the cumulative impact of all the logging.